Lifted Veil

Dear friends,

Introducing NewCovenantTheology.org. - my latest team project.  I’ve set it up and have invited a number of key New Covenant Theology (NCT) representatives to be added as editors to the list of contributors.

Goal:  An NCT hub to act as a portal to key NCT information and sites.  Continue Reading »

Here is the audio and associated notes from the Think Tank in New York.

To download any files right click on the associated text and select ‘Save Target As . . .’

Session 1 NCT Journey (Joe Krygier)
  Part 1 of 1

Session 2  Holy Spirit Dynamics in the New Covenant Community
(Moe Bergeron)
  Part 1 of 3
  Part 2 of 3
  Part 3 of 3 
 
  Notes

Session 3 A Re-examination of Atonement in the New Covenant
(Reid Ferguson)
  Part 1 of 2
  Part 2 of 2

  Notes

Session 4  Christ as a Covenant for the People (Chad Bresson)
  Part 1 of 2
  Part 2 of 2

  Notes

Session 5 A New Covenant Approach to Biblical Counseling (Joe Krygier)
  Part 1 of 1

  Notes

Session 6  The Future of NCT (Ed Trefzger)
  Part 1 of 1

Master Files:  http://www.fbceny.org/audio/cherith/

“Hi Shane, I’m thankful that the Lord has given us many powerful motives in the form of doctrinal truths (indicatives) as reasons why we should obey Him. However, would you agree that the Bible uses an indicative to motivate only some imperatives? But, other imperatives are given with no motives, just sheer duty?Do you believe it’s OK to obey God out of duty, with no conscious motive? (No, that’s not Phariseeism or legalism. Christ rebuked the Pharisees for obeying from sinful motives, not NO motives.)  Can I suggest that much if not most of our obedience is without conscious motives? Every day we obey our Lord from disciplined habits of godliness. And, you know what? That’s not a sin.  Sure, I prefer to stop and think about why I should obey.  But, we often don’t have time to think.  And, God accepts our obedience in Christ, whether from conscious motives or no motives. . .”

This post is a continued response which started by making some general comments to clarify what I believe (last post).  In this post I will interact specifically with the above objection. Continue Reading »

“Hi Shane, I’m thankful that the Lord has given us many powerful motives in the form of doctrinal truths (indicatives) as reasons why we should obey Him.However, would you agree that the Bible uses an indicative to motivate only some imperatives? But, other imperatives are given with no motives, just sheer duty?

Do you believe it’s OK to obey God out of duty, with no conscious motive? (No, that’s not Phariseeism or legalism. Christ rebuked the Pharisees for obeying from sinful motives, not NO motives.)

Can I suggest that much if not most of our obedience is without conscious motives? Every day we obey our Lord from disciplined habits of godliness. And, you know what? That’s not a sin.

Sure, I prefer to stop and think about why I should obey. But, we often don’t have time to think. And, God accepts our obedience in Christ, whether from conscious motives or no motives. . .”

I’ll respond by making some general comments to clarify what I believe (this post) and then interact specifically with the above objection (next post).  Continue Reading »

New Covenant Person - Joe KrygierNew Covenant Person - Joe Krygier

New Covenant Power - Shane BeckerNew Covenant Power - Shane Becker

Below are some selective quotes from Prof. Dennis M. Swanson, from The Masters Seminary, critiquing New Covenant Theology (NCT) and its adherents.  Prof. Swanson accurately states, NCT . . .

” . . . is firmly within the Evangelical Tradition . . . they love the Scripture, they believe in inerrancy, they love the Lord Jesus Christ, they teach justification by faith, they teach . . . many of the things we would affirm here. “

“. . . is characterised by a diligent and sincere effort to understand and apply the Scripture consistently . . . it is clear that these are folks who honour the word of God and want to understand it and they want to apply it rightly to their lives and to the lives of the people they are leading”.

” . . . is a movement dedicated to the local church. It is a local church movement. It is a group that is probably more concerned about their local churches than they are even propagating their system . . .”

“. . . is a grass roots movement. It is a movement that has come not from the academy, not from noted theological writers, not from seminaries, and filtered down to the churches. It is a movement that has started among Pastors in churches . . .”

“There is also no unified eschatology among New Covenant Theologians.  In New Covenant Theology premillennialism,  postmillennialism and amillennialism are all represented  . . . the only unanimity they have in their eschatology is . . . they are unified in rejecting a future for the nation of Israel as a distinct entity . . . What they have done with eschatology is simply render it unimportant . . . Corporate eschatology, in relation to the millennium, rapture, and so on, those kinds of questions are just not important (to them). . . it is simply not important. It is a non-issue. It is nothing to get bothered about. It is a minor and unimportant issue in terms of studies.” 

“It is clear this movement does represent an honest attempt to examine the Scripture and apply it to the believer.  Their ministries are geared around the local church,  helping individual believers, evangelism . . . they are very, very strong in Bible study.”

And my personal favourites:

“Perhaps most importantly . . . New Covenant Theology is a theology of the Internet. . . absent the internet, and absent the connectivity of people being able to have web pages and email and communicate back and forth, it is likely that New Covenant Theology simply would not exist. It would exist in individual minds and individual churches scattered who never connect.”  (Yes!!)

“All of their (NCT related) published works have come from their own ministry based publishing efforts.” 

“In Depth Studies began as a campus ministry in Arizona state.  This is the ministry of Lehrer, Volker and Feather. It is a web based umbrella sort of ministry . . . It is very well done. It is a good site, they take very good care of it, they are very savvy in their use of the internet and their material there is easily accessible and for the most part its free.” 
(And well done to Jaime Adams, the webmaster of IDS.org!!).

Thank you Prof Swanson for your fair, kind, encouraging and accurate words regarding NCT in the above quotes. 
 

The Masters Seminary (TMS) is currently critiquing New Covenant Theology (NCT) in their current faculty lecture series.  These are available for download from their site:    Download Link.

Also be sure to keep up with the In Depth Studies (IDS) ongoing response by Steve Lehrer on their blog:

http://idsblog.org/

As I am associate editor of SoloChristo.com the comments by Prof. Dennis M. Swanson, regarding the growth of NCT being largely attributed to the internet, makes me do the happy dance.  SoloChristo.com was the flagship of the NCT internet web sites.  Full credit to senior editor Dale LaVoie who early recognised the significance of the internet medium for the spread of the great gospel truths expounded in NCT, who built the site from scratch and launched it back in 1994.  I can take no credit for the early impact of SoloChristo.com but am privileged to be part of this great project in taking over the running of the site and keeping its impact going.  The story of how I came to take over this great work can be found here.

Full credit also to Jaime Adams who has built the IDS.org site and blog and keeps it going.  The quality of IDS.org sets a new standard in web site excellence that the rest of us webmasters in the NCT community struggle to keep up with. Prof. Dennis M. Swanson also mentioned the quality of this site and its ongoing impact.  It was a real joy for me to meet Jaime last year and discuss options for working together. 

And I must also mention Moe Bergeron, who has single-handedly launched the following:

• SoundofGrace.com, the web ministry of John Reisinger.
• Piper Notes, the original John Piper library web site launching his ministry on the internet.
• Christway Media, for Donald A. Carson and others.
• Biblical Studies, the web ministry of Fred Zaspel.
• The Grizzly Bible Institute web site.
• The Sound of Grace Discussion Group, which continues to be a key web forum where NCT representatives sharpen one another.

Moe has become a wonderful friend and role model for me.  In addition to his web work Moe has maintained a full time secular job as well as maintained a Pastorate. 

There are others who I haven’t mentioned because I don’t know who they are although I am very familiar with their web sites and the authors they support.  The work of an NCT webmaster is largely ‘behind the scenes’ and not recognised although the impact has been significant.  Maintaining the prominent NCT web ministries come down to only a handful of people.  For the most part we don’t have paid webmasters or faculty staff to do this work.  It is a labor of love to our glorious Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

A friend at church asked me how I would describe New Covenant Theology. Below is my reply.

–//–

Regarding your question about the characteristics of New Covenant Theology.
 
I would describe New Covenant Theology in terms of ‘flavour’ and ‘distinctives’.
 
1. Flavour
 
You are familiar with the flavour.  It is the same flavour of Christ Community Church (NB: Church we both attend) . That is, seeing the totality of God’s redemptive program culminating in the person and work of Jesus Christ and living daily in the joy and grace of that reality.  For the most part, when I think of NCT, I think of people, churches, and theology that use the entire Bible to help us “look unto Jesus”, “preach nothing but Christ and Him crucified” and display Christ’s work through “Moses and all the Prophets”. (Heb 12:2, 1 Cor 2:2, Luke 24:13-27).  NCT is centred upon the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.
 
This article describes NCT with an emphasis upon that ‘flavour’:  http://liftedveil.org/theology/nct/MurrayMcLellan_GloryofGodinFaceofJesus.html
 
2. Distinctives
 
The distinctives, like Covenant Theology & Dispensationalism, have some variance among the NCT individuals.  However, I believe this article summarises the key distinctives well: http://liftedveil.org/theology/nct/GaryLong_NewCovenantTheologyDistinctives.html
 
Your brother in Christ, Our Covenant-
 
Shane.
 
“I am the LORD; I have called you in righteousness;
   I will take you by the hand and keep you;
I will give you as a covenant for the people,
   a light for the nations” Isaiah 42:6
 
“Thus says the LORD:
‘In a time of favor I have answered you;
   in a day of salvation I have helped you;
I will keep you and give you
   as a covenant to the people,
to establish the land,
   to apportion the desolate heritages,’ ” Isaiah 49:8
 
 
 

Continue Reading »

"Since there is but one covenant, and the Scriptures speak of it as though it were two, we must consider in what particulars the old and new covenants agree and in what they differ." Dr. Zacharias Ursinus

Continue Reading »

Study Notes

16So let no one judge you in food or in drink, or regarding a festival or a new moon or sabbaths, 17which are a shadow of things to come, but the substance is of Christ. 18Let no one cheat you of your reward, taking delight in false humility and worship of angels, intruding into those things which he has not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind, 19and not holding fast to the Head, from whom all the body, nourished and knit together by joints and ligaments, grows with the increase that is from God. 20Therefore, if you died with Christ from the basic principles of the world, why, as though living in the world, do you subject yourselves to regulations– 21Do not touch, do not taste, do not handle,” 22which all concern things which perish with the using–according to the commandments and doctrines of men? 23These things indeed have an appearance of wisdom in self-imposed religion, false humility, and neglect of the body, but are of no value against the indulgence of the flesh.  Col 2:16-23
 

The “Sabbath(s)” of Colosians 2:16

“So let no one judge you in food or in drink, or regarding a festival or a new moon or sabbaths . . . “

Four interpretations – 3 Sabbatarian & 1 Non-Sabbatarian:

1.      Sabbath = “Ceremonial” Sabbaths and not the Sabbath of the 4^th Commandment. (Common among Sunday Sabbatarians such as the puritans).

2.      Sabbath = Old Testament ceremonial and civil elements which are abolished. However, a 1 day in 7 cycle still remains.

3.      Sabbath = a perverted “Sabbath” practiced in Collose which bears no resemblance to the Sabbath of the 4^th Commandment. The condemnation is against this new and perverted “Sabbath” with no reference being made to the true Sabbath.

4.      Sabbath = The Weekly Sabbath day of the 4^th Commandment.

Continue Reading »